One of the key priorities of OVC is to engage with students and departments to develop and pursue a roadmap for enhancing the first-year undergraduate academic experience.
Progress to Date
In August of 2018 the Committee on the Undergraduate Program (CUP) agreed to move forward with an experiment to investigate ways to promote greater exploration in the first-year undergraduate experience.
The proposal was made possible through a marvelous collaboration between students, faculty, staff and administrators over the last year and incorporates some specific recommendations from the Designing the First Year at MIT course (spring FYE ’18).
Preliminary results suggest that the experiment is enabling students to explore more broadly. At the same time, many continue to take science core GIR subjects early in their time at MIT. Students who do so cite reasons such as catching up to their peers, satisfying prerequisites for majors of interest, or using certain GIRs (typically chemistry or biology) as exploration opportunities.
- Compared to last year, there were 538 fewer first-year enrollments in science core GIRs this fall (about one fewer science core GIR for every other student).
- Students used the freed-up units in a variety of ways: taking 14% more unique subjects (which increased from 280 to 318) in the fall. Seventy-five percent of these were subjects specifically designated by departments as being good for exploration.
- We are still in the process of collecting and analyzing spring registration data as this data is considered preliminary until after Add Date, but initial data suggest that these trends have continued to a lesser extend in the spring. As of the end of the first week of classes, there were roughly 200 fewer science core GIRs registrations by first-year students as compared to last year. Taken as a whole, on average, this means that about three quarters of the students registered for one fewer science core GIR in the first year. There was also a slight increase in the number of unique subjects, with 4% more compared to last year (an increase from 403 to 420).
We have an early sense of the different ways students are taking advantage of the increased flexibility to explore majors, minors, and concentrations.
- The students who are exploring fall roughly equally into three categories (based on the work of the prior CUP Study Group on Undergraduate Majors Exploration):
- Focused: they are firm about their desired major upon entry to MIT and seek to engage and explore within that major.
- Focused/open: they have 2-4 different majors in mind and seek to explore to choose among them.
- Open: they have no idea what their major will be and seek to explore to discover their major interest.
We have not seen a reduction in student performance (fall hidden GPA) in science core GIR or non-science core GIR subjects.
The number of unique majors selected by students electing early sophomore standing has increased from 17 to 19.
- There is a reduction in the percentage of early sophomores declaring Course 6, although it is too early to tell if this will correlate with ultimate major declarations for the full class.
To augment the experiment, the Office of the Vice Chancellor (OVC) offered support to departments for developing subjects to aid students in major exploration.
- Eight new subjects were created and offered this year, a handful of others were revised and advertised with OVC support, and at least two more will be offered during AY2020.
- For details see: https://ovc.mit.edu/strategic-priorities/faculty-call-for-exploratory-subjects/
Important open questions remain about the experiment’s current and longer-term impacts that we are committed to answering.
- How does taking classes on P/NR (either in the first semester or thereafter) impact performance in those classes and in subsequent classes that rely on that material?
- Does taking science core GIRs on P/NR impact reported levels of academic stress?
- How does the policy affect student confidence in their choice of major? How does it affect satisfaction with the major after graduation?
We are also committed to continuing to experiment.
- We are considering a potential experiment for the Class of 2023 in discussion with the CUP.
- Our initial findings from the current experiment indicate a need to encourage more low-unit discovery of majors, minors, and topics in addition to enabling more traditional student practices of exploring majors through introductory subjects. The proposed Phase Two experiment is designed to balance these two approaches.
- Advising pilot for the Class of 2023
- Another important need expressed by students and faculty throughout our efforts is the need to improve our advising system in the first year and beyond. The proposed pilot divides advising functions among a small network including faculty, staff, and peers rather than concentrating the many functions in a single faculty member.
- Testing “blue-sky ideas” in first-year learning communities
- Building on student ideas from the two Designing the First-Year Experience offerings (Spring 2018 and IAP 2019) as well as ideas from faculty and instructors, we intend to leverage the flexible and personalized nature of the First-Year Learning Communities to try out new approaches to foster curiosity in the first year.
IAP Design Course
DFY: Fun-Sized (2.s974/2.s790) is a 3-unit follow-up to the original Designing the First-Year Experience at MIT class offered in Spring 2018.
The class will focus on exploring ideas for radical changes to the first-year experience that could be piloted with a small group of students, for example in a First-Year Learning Community (FLC), as well as less dramatic changes that could be tested with the entire Class of 2023.
It will be offered in IAP 2019 and will be co-taught by Professor Maria Yang and Vice Chancellor Ian Waitz. The class will be held from 2-5 pm every day for the last two weeks of IAP (1/22-2/1). Class participants are expected to attend every session.
Designing the First Year at MIT Spring 2018 Course
As part of the Office of the Vice Chancellor’s priority on exploring the first year undergraduate experience, MIT offered a spring 2018 course, Designing the First Year at MIT, to surface and leverage students’ own insights and recommendations. Open to all enrolled undergraduate and graduate students, the design-intensive course used the MIT first-year experience as a way to teach different methods for how to examine an issue, understand it better, tease out what constituents prioritize changing, design alternate prototypes, evaluate those, and iterate.
With peers and faculty from across the Institute, students reimagined and redesigned the first-year undergraduate experience; developed new skills in design, learning science, and communication; and presented a final project to senior administration. Learn more about the outcomes of the class and preliminary plans to implement students’ recommendations.
Enhancing First-Year Orientation
Orientation for first-year MIT students now focuses on the importance of exploration.
In the News
- DFY website
- Creating a more flexible first-year experience at MIT (MIT News, December 12, 2018)
- A Collaboration in Learning : “Designing the First Year at MIT” class catalyzes experimentation in the first year (Sept/Oct 2018, MIT Faculty Newsletter)
- Tackling the ultimate problem set (MIT News, June 5, 2018)
- Video: First-Year Design Course at MIT (June 12, 2018)
- Harnessing a “meritocracy of great ideas” (MIT News, November 30, 2017)
- ‘Designing the Freshman Year’ course will pilot in spring (The Tech, November 30, 2017)
- Designing the First Year at MIT: It’s not a faculty committee, it’s a class (Nov/Dec 2017, MIT Faculty Newsletter)
- Exploring the impact of Margaret MacVicar’s legacy on education at MIT (MIT News, April 6, 2017)